The facts Howell outlined - including a statement from the FBI confirming an inquiry into the claims and another statement that the inquiry had been concluded without action - track closely with accusations Hollywood star ANGELINA JOLIE leveled at her then-husband BRAD PITT as she filed for divorce from him in 2016. District Court Chief Judge BERYL HOWELL said the case stems from an FBI investigation into allegations that the plaintiff’s “then-husband … physically and verbally assaulted” her and their children while they were traveling on board a private plane “several years ago.” WHO IS JANE DOE? - Josh Gerstein writes in: Rulings in Freedom of Information Act suits rarely capture much attention in Washington, but an intriguing decision released Monday allowing a woman to anonymously file such a case against the FBI is prompting curiosity about just who is the “JANE DOE” behind the suit. Set screen time limits, decide who can comment on their content and more, so everyone can use TikTok safely and responsibly. It’s also why we developed Family Pairing tools that let parents link their account to their teens’ and decide together what settings work best. That's why accounts for anyone aged 13-15 are set to private by default without access to direct messaging. We work hard to create a positive experience for teens. Here’s how it looks right now … The House: likely Republican. JUST POSTED: FORECASTING 2022 - This morning, POLITICO came out with its first election forecasts of the 2022 cycle. And it would give voters a clear target of who to blame for mask mandates despite prominent Democrats’ efforts to distance themselves from the unpopular (if scientifically sound) policy. But politically, the administration would risk political blowback on a hot political topic heading into the summer travel season.As a matter of credibility, it reiterates the CDC’s central role in setting health-related pandemic policies.The move by the court makes that decision for them. Democrats have already been moving away from mask mandates for months, saying it’s time for folks to get back to normal. But politically, it takes a tough issue off the White House’s plate.It also raises the question of why the administration just re-upped the mandate if this was really the policy it wanted. As a matter of credibility, it risks hurting the institutional authority of the CDC, which they said would be central to the decision-making process.And that suggests a few interesting options for the administration: “White House officials have repeatedly stressed that any further extension of the mask mandate would be made by the CDC,” Alex and Erin write. Just last week, the Biden administration extended the mandate to May 3 - a move made “in the face of increasing opposition from the airline industry as well as Republicans and some Democrats in Congress,” as our Alex Daugherty and Erin Banco report. Unofficially: The White House is still figuring out what to do next, weighing two very big factors: credibility and politics.Officially: White House press secretary JEN PSAKI told reporters the administration was “reviewing the decision, and, of course, the Department of Justice would be making any determinations about any litigation.”.The surprise ruling seems to have caught the White House flat-footed on the question of whether or not to appeal the ruling. On Monday, just hours after a federal judge struck down the nationwide public transportation mask mandate, major airlines (and even President JOE BIDEN’s beloved Amtrak) began telling their passengers they could stop wearing the protective face coverings - sometimes while they had already boarded and taken their assigned seats. The White House is still figuring out what to do next after a federal judge struck down the nationwide public transportation mask mandate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |